Pete Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Hey Folks, It's almost time for the Annual BSBH Year End Awards. Before we open nominations, we need some feedback from you guys on how this should work. Some awards are going to be 1 win only awards, such as the Nevins Award and the Clutterbuck Award. We view the Nevins as sort of a "Lifetime Achievement" Award and the funniest username...well, if you win once and don't change your name, you shouldn't win again. That being said, as it relates to the other awards...In order to keep things fresh and interesting, we've toyed with the idea that the current holder of an award should not be eligible to win the award consecutively. For example, Phil holds the "Forever Frozen Award", so he would not be eligible to win it again, but someone else will win this year, and he'll be eligible again next year. Would you guys prefer that method, or would you prefer the best candidate win, and I keep the Boogaard forever? Please vote in the poll and post any rationales here. The Staff will be abstaining from posting in this poll as to not influence the users in any way, but we will answer questions if you have them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chizz Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 I say you can win back to back years, but can't win a third year in a row. You should have the opportunity to defend your title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew a Penalty Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Went with "Current Winner Will Be Ineligible to Win Consecutively." It just changes things up and can really affect the voting process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H-Dreamer Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 I think it might be best to take current title holders out of the competition for a year. Keeps more people interested imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunny Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 May the best man win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 "Congrats! You are the MOST OBSESSED HOCKEY FAN to not win the award last year!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnydollaz18 Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 No repeat winners! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven. Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Best = most deserving regardless of whether or not they won the year prior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-ERIK- Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 Best = most deserving regardless of whether or not they won the year prior. same winners every year=less people voting or participating Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 May the best candidate win. If there are people that don't want repeat winners, they can vote for someone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven. Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 same winners every year=less people voting or participating Valid point. Dead even poll. Damn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted July 4, 2013 Author Share Posted July 4, 2013 May the best candidate win. If there are people that don't want repeat winners, they can vote for someone else. Who would vote for themselves? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphinity 2.0 Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 Can't you guys agree on anything? Jeez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsley Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 I'm for repeat champs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 Who would vote for themselves? I didn't say to vote for yourself. If you won the XX award last year and someone(s) don't agree with repeat winners, they can vote for someone else. I think the previous winners should have a chance to defend, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LindG1000 Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 This shit is close, folks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted July 4, 2013 Author Share Posted July 4, 2013 I didn't say to vote for yourself. If you won the XX award last year and someone(s) don't agree with repeat winners, they can vote for someone else. I think the previous winners should have a chance to defend, though. Ohh, gotcha. Misunderstood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerms Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 Everyone should win, I dont want to see any hurt feelings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 This poll closes tomorrow around 2:20 PM, so you've got about a day left to vote if you haven't yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.